Show shoppers their skin actually improving.
Compare any saved scan with an earlier one. Every concern and overall skin damage, before and after — so improvement is a number, not a feeling, and your products get the credit.
Proof the routine is working
Skincare takes weeks to show. Comparing two scans turns “I think it's better” into a number for each concern — and a reason to keep using, and reordering, the routine.
It runs on the analyses already in a shopper's history, so there's nothing to set up beyond turning history on.
- 01
Same metrics, two dates
Each concern and overall skin damage, before and after, with the change.
- 02
Honest by design
Changes too small to matter are marked stable rather than counted as progress.
- 03
A summary they understand
Improved, worsened and stable counts, and where the biggest changes were.
Compare with any earlier analysis
In a saved result, the Compare tab puts the current analysis next to an earlier one. A drop-down lists every earlier scan by date, and the headline shows the overall change.
- Earlier and current photos side by side
- Choose the earlier scan by date
- Overall Improvement, Regression or No significant change
Every metric, before and after
Each concern — plus overall skin damage — shows both values and the change, sorted by the biggest movement first and tagged Improved, Regressed or Stable.
- Before → after values for each concern
- Small changes inside a dead band count as Stable
- Lighting and photo quality widen that band, so a darker selfie isn't read as worse skin
One sentence they can share
The summary counts what improved, worsened and stayed stable, then names the biggest movers — written for the shopper, not for a dermatologist.
- Improved, worsened and stable counts
- “The largest improvements were in …”
- Clear messages when there's nothing comparable
Overall, skin metrics improved by 3.6% compared with the earlier scan.
6 improved0 worsened8 stableThe largest improvements were in Redness, Dark Circle, and Oiliness.
- Improved The score went down beyond the dead band
- Stable The change is too small to count
- Regressed The score went up beyond the dead band
- Insufficient data The metric is missing from one scan
How the comparison works
14 metrics
13 concerns plus overall skin damage.
Dead band
Small differences are reported as stable, not progress.
Lighting-aware
Brightness and photo quality differences make it more conservative.
Direction that makes sense
Lower concern scores read as an improvement.
Shopper-friendly summary
Counts plus the concerns that moved most.
Any two scans
Pick the earlier scan from the shopper's history.
Face Age gave our clinic a powerful, accurate way to guide clients to the right treatment plan. They trust the scan more than a paper consultation form, and it's easy for our team to maintain.
Comparison, answered
Analysis history. Comparison uses the analyses saved in a shopper's history, so it appears as soon as they have more than one.
The 13 concerns — fine wrinkles, eye wrinkles, deep wrinkles, dark circles, eye bags, pores, pigment, redness, oiliness, dryness, sagginess, dullness and acne — plus overall skin damage.
Differences inside a small dead band are treated as noise. When the two photos differ in lighting or quality, the band widens and the scanner notes that small changes were ignored.
No. It compares the cosmetic skin analysis between two selfies to help shoppers follow their routine.
Works even better together
Progress
Ready to add this to your store?
Add it to your site in minutes — with the SDK, a plugin or the Shopify app — or let the team build the whole system for you in 14 days.